fsmithred | so the idea is to have this one in the repo with higher version and it gets selected? | 00:08 |
---|---|---|
fsmithred | oh, I guess you need the right udebs for the iso | 00:09 |
palinuro | yes | 00:15 |
palinuro | by now the devuan1 in the end overloads the current debian release, but we should probably put a 2: in front of the version number to olverload any future version and manually take care of it | 00:16 |
fsmithred | Centurion_Dan, I'm not seeing the package. | 00:21 |
fsmithred | while we're on the subject of the digit that comes after the +devuan, I'd like to say that we should decide what that number means and be consistent. | 00:22 |
fsmithred | some people use it as a revision number and some use it to correspond to the suite, with a decimal for the revision. | 00:22 |
fsmithred | just throwing that out there in general, not specifically at you palinuro | 00:22 |
palinuro | we at parrot use it to identify packages coming from our team and have to replace an upstream (debian) version. but we used to maintain only one branch | 00:24 |
fsmithred | yeah, the +devuan is just for packages that we change | 00:25 |
palinuro | how should a suite-based tag work instead? | 00:25 |
fsmithred | what I'm talking about is that in some cases, +devuan1 means first revision and +devuan2 means second revision | 00:25 |
palinuro | +devuanascii/+devuanbeowulf? | 00:25 |
fsmithred | and in other cases, +devuan1 means first revision for jessie | 00:25 |
fsmithred | 2 for ascii | 00:26 |
fsmithred | but we aren't consistent about it | 00:26 |
palinuro | <fsmithred "what I'm talking about is that i"> wait, i probably got your point | 00:26 |
fsmithred | yeah | 00:26 |
fsmithred | I should put it on the pad some time | 00:27 |
fsmithred | live iso is building now. I'm headed for the kitchen. | 00:32 |
fsmithred | iso boots in uefi (in qemu) | 00:45 |
fsmithred | palinuro, your package works here | 00:46 |
palinuro | <3 | 00:53 |
Centurion_Dan | fsmithred: should be there now. | 02:03 |
Centurion_Dan | sorry, dak needed prodding... | 02:03 |
fsmithred | Installed: 1.10.22-1+devuan2 | 02:39 |
fsmithred | Candidate: 1.10.28-0+deb9u1+devuan1 | 02:39 |
fsmithred | Centurion_Dan, ^^^ that's the right candidate? | 02:40 |
fsmithred | The packages installed ok. Rebooting. Anything in particular I should look at? | 02:45 |
Centurion_Dan | It should be all good. I was most concerned about the installation. I made all the build tests work so that's all good. | 02:59 |
fsmithred | I installed it first with aptitude, and it gave me a warning and offered to install dbus-x11. The library was already going to be installed. | 03:01 |
fsmithred | so I did it. | 03:01 |
fsmithred | Then I downgraded and installed it again but with apt-get, and it just installed all three packages | 03:01 |
Centurion_Dan | ok cool. I'll need to fix the ppc64el builder so that it doesn't fail on lintian, and then will rebuild for ascii-security and ascii. | 03:12 |
fsmithred | great | 03:13 |
Centurion_Dan | once that's building I'll do the testing/unstable releases as well. | 03:13 |
Centurion_Dan | I'm tempted to disable the armel builder as we don't have a reliable one currently operational. | 03:14 |
fsmithred | how is it pkgmaster gets your new package, but not ff-esr in ascii-security? | 03:18 |
Centurion_Dan | fsmithred: that's probably because amprolla isn't merging correctly for ascii-security | 04:03 |
fsmithred | I'm not sure it's doing anything - there have been no log entries since 17th | 04:14 |
Evilham | This ^^^°° | 10:15 |
palinuro | <Centurion_Dan "ok cool. I'll need to fix the p"> Centurion_Dan do you use sbuild with qemu? | 10:48 |
Centurion_Dan | palinuro: jenkins ci with pbuilder. | 13:20 |
fsmithred | g'morning/g'evening Centurion_Dan | 13:21 |
Centurion_Dan | fsmithred: o/ | 13:21 |
fsmithred | did you see my question about build labels yesterday? I couldn't find where to create a beowulf label. I could enter the text, but couldn't figure out how to save it. | 13:21 |
fsmithred | Create project label, enter the text, select a color... | 13:24 |
fsmithred | then what? | 13:25 |
Centurion_Dan | when you create a new label, drag the slider down and select create. | 13:25 |
Centurion_Dan | I know, it's a terrible design | 13:25 |
fsmithred | I clicked on Create | 13:26 |
fsmithred | entered 'beowulf' in the text box | 13:26 |
fsmithred | selected a color (close to cinnabar) | 13:26 |
fsmithred | I just did it again and tried Enter | 13:26 |
fsmithred | and it went to a build page | 13:26 |
fsmithred | so I think maybe it worked | 13:26 |
Centurion_Dan | drag the slider on the right of that dialogue | 13:26 |
fsmithred | I'm no longer on that page | 13:27 |
fsmithred | the slider that shows the existing labels? | 13:27 |
Centurion_Dan | down, and there is "cancel" and "create" button. | 13:27 |
Centurion_Dan | down to the bottom. | 13:27 |
fsmithred | anyway,it says "Opened 1 minute ago..." | 13:27 |
fsmithred | ok, I went back | 13:28 |
fsmithred | slider all the way down, last label is unstable | 13:28 |
fsmithred | below that is where to create | 13:28 |
fsmithred | or manage | 13:28 |
fsmithred | oh... | 13:28 |
Centurion_Dan | yeah... that interface really sucks... | 13:29 |
fsmithred | ok, I went to manage and it lists the existing labels | 13:30 |
fsmithred | and then in the upper-right corner is a "new label" button | 13:30 |
fsmithred | trying that | 13:30 |
fsmithred | oh! I can use a hex code for the color. golinux will be pleased. | 13:31 |
Xenguy | hah | 13:36 |
Xenguy | hex codes FTW | 13:36 |
fsmithred | looks like that worked. The new label is in the list. | 13:38 |
fsmithred | Should see something in devuan-ci soon. | 13:38 |
Centurion_Dan | fsmithred: that last build command failed so you'll have to try again. | 13:39 |
fsmithred | any reason given? | 13:39 |
Centurion_Dan | No valid suite label specified and no default suite in [jobs] section. Do nothing | 13:39 |
fsmithred | yeah, found that. | 13:39 |
fsmithred | how do I validate my label? | 13:40 |
Centurion_Dan | I get an email for every job created | 13:40 |
Centurion_Dan | try again selecting the label | 13:40 |
fsmithred | I went to manage labels, and then prioritized it | 13:41 |
fsmithred | so it's now up at the top of that page with the ascii label | 13:41 |
fsmithred | issued again | 13:42 |
Centurion_Dan | you have to select the label when you create the issue. | 13:44 |
Centurion_Dan | so title = build, recipient = autobuildbot (or whatever it is), label=beowulf | 13:45 |
fsmithred | yeah, that's what I always do | 13:46 |
Centurion_Dan | s/recipient/assignee/ | 13:46 |
fsmithred | tried again | 13:47 |
fsmithred | got any other ideas? | 13:53 |
fsmithred | oh, it worked. Did I do that? | 13:54 |
fsmithred | looks like it failed | 13:54 |
fsmithred | did it fail because of ppc? | 13:56 |
fsmithred | Centurion_Dan, is it time to try again? | 13:58 |
fsmithred | I just got an email saying that I'm now a maintainer of this project | 13:59 |
Centurion_Dan | yeah, that is probably why it failed... | 14:05 |
Centurion_Dan | it failed because the host failed to create a beowulf base cow. | 14:06 |
fsmithred | what's that? | 14:06 |
Centurion_Dan | its a copy on write base that is used to instantiate a clean copy of the os for use by pbuilder. | 14:08 |
fsmithred | oh | 14:08 |
Centurion_Dan | I might have to take a look at that host... | 14:09 |
fsmithred | why did I get: You have been granted Maintainer access to the devuan-packages / refractainstaller-base project. | 14:09 |
Centurion_Dan | because I granted you maintainer status on that package. | 14:09 |
fsmithred | didn't I already have that? | 14:09 |
Centurion_Dan | apparently not.... I'm surprised you could push changes at all... | 14:09 |
fsmithred | and build for unstable | 14:10 |
fsmithred | so is there a way to exclude architectures? | 14:11 |
Centurion_Dan | there is a very basic acl... | 14:11 |
Centurion_Dan | to late at night to explain now. | 14:12 |
fsmithred | yeah, ok | 14:12 |
fsmithred | I didn't have this problem when I built refractasnapshot for unstable around two weeks ago. | 14:15 |
Centurion_Dan | different package?? | 14:18 |
fsmithred | yeah, different package | 14:26 |
fsmithred | built this package for unstable a couple months ago | 14:26 |
Centurion_Dan | really weird then... did you revoke your maintainership somewhere along the way?? | 14:44 |
Centurion_Dan | I've discovered the issue on that buildhost causing it not to successfully build new cows, and have alerted parazyd to the issue - I don't have access to that host. | 14:45 |
fsmithred | I didn't revoke anything but I do recall a long time ago my privs got revoked | 14:48 |
fsmithred | before ascii release | 14:48 |
fsmithred | it got fixed and I could build stuff | 14:48 |
fsmithred | but my understand is that I could work on any project | 14:49 |
fsmithred | and I have worked on a few that weren't mine | 14:49 |
fsmithred | my profile shows that I'm a maintainer of all projects in devuan-packages | 14:51 |
Centurion_Dan | ah... of course, your a maintainer in the devuan-packages group.... | 14:51 |
Centurion_Dan | now I'm really confused... | 14:52 |
fsmithred | I want a map | 14:52 |
fsmithred | pictures with circles and arrows | 14:52 |
Centurion_Dan | as to why you could'nt kick off a build in beowulf. | 14:52 |
Centurion_Dan | :-p | 14:52 |
fsmithred | OT question, pm | 14:53 |
Centurion_Dan | there is a description | 14:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!