rrq | have you renamed directories or is there some other mixup? | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
Guest95 | rrq one has iso's, the other disks | 00:00 |
Guest95 | they give the same error | 00:01 |
gnarface | there's no chance you'd need group write is there? | 00:01 |
rrq | which user+group runs qemu? | 00:02 |
Guest95 | I think I killed this installation | 00:03 |
Guest95 | forget about it, thanks for trying to help. appreciated | 00:03 |
gnarface | well you might not have, but if you've changed other stuff... hard to say | 00:03 |
Guest95 | gnarface I tried to give libvirt-qemu etc. access through ACL and more, even disabling everything and going back to normal won't let me run qemu | 00:04 |
Guest95 | what I could try doing is moving the disks and isos out of the home dir | 00:05 |
Guest95 | and forget about it, I'll try that | 00:05 |
rwp | It seems to me that Guest95's issue must have been that root was also blocked. Which was probably intended. But that also blocked access. | 00:18 |
rwp | When I look at my libvirt installation the VMs that are not running have images owned by root:root but upon running are libvirt-qemu:libvirt-qemu which would require root access to effect. | 00:19 |
gnarface | so probably not something that requires a reinstall to fix? | 00:23 |
rwp | I would think not. And also the VM image data itself should be unaffected. | 00:25 |
netbsd | hello | 13:46 |
netbsd | I have devuan arm64 | 13:46 |
netbsd | i need a kernel for my pinebook | 13:46 |
netbsd | so i found out that recompiling the modules from vanilla kerneel 5.18 is best | 13:47 |
onefang | #devuan-arm might bee the better place to ask. | 13:47 |
netbsd | ok, but then, I get ERROR at make. The encrption of signature fails. | 13:47 |
netbsd | signature and "make" stops. | 13:47 |
netbsd | it requires a sign or sort signature while compiling 5.18.0 kernel | 13:48 |
netbsd | n here some blog : https://www.kulesz.me/post/150_devuan_pinebookpro/ | 13:53 |
buZz | why build such a old kernel? | 13:53 |
netbsd | because I want to mimic the default delivered kernel - similar to the one i got with manjaro | 14:04 |
netbsd | 5.18.0-4 was my kernel when i got the delivery of this notebook pb pro | 14:04 |
buZz | i dont understand why you want old software, but ok | 14:05 |
onefang | Hardware issue with the non native kernel? | 14:06 |
buZz | pinebook is just a rk3399 iirc? | 14:06 |
buZz | pro* | 14:07 |
buZz | yeah, it is | 14:07 |
buZz | should be fine in mainline kernel, mostly | 14:07 |
buZz | there's #linux-rockchip, fyi | 14:07 |
netbsd | does devuan provide a readdy to use SD/MMC for this pb pro ? | 14:14 |
onefang | Another reason to suggest #devuan-arm, I think they mentioned that recently. | 14:15 |
buZz | onefang: i dont think 'netbsd' wanted knowledg ;) | 14:16 |
buZz | imho pinebook is pretty much a waste of time | 14:17 |
buZz | most pine- hw even | 14:17 |
buZz | its all just shovelware with near zero softwaresupport | 14:17 |
buZz | pinebook non-pro worked for 5 times before the case just fell apart :P | 14:18 |
Helenah | buZz, There's also the pine64 IRC network which is official. | 14:21 |
buZz | Helenah: cool, is that where you can complain about the hw? :D | 14:21 |
Helenah | No, it's where you go and you tell them nicely about it, anyway https://www.pine64.org/web-irc/ | 14:22 |
Helenah | buZz, Also, come join #devuan-offtopic, I want to talk but what I want to talk about which is more the topic of pine64 isn't appropriate for here. | 14:24 |
clemens3 | stupid gpg question: I try to verify Devuan iso signed by Ralph Ronnquist (rrq) <ralph.ronnquist@gmail.com>. I trust fsmithreds key.. I imported the devuan-dev.gpg, but i don't see who signed the ronnquist key? I can I follow the chain of trust to fsmithred? | 14:39 |
clemens3 | I can=How can | 14:40 |
onefang | rrq might be asleep now, past midnight where he lives I think. | 14:41 |
onefang | Well I knew where he lived some time ago, dunno if he's moved since. | 14:41 |
clemens3 | yeah, just how can i check his public pgp key? | 14:51 |
clemens3 | in principle | 14:51 |
clemens3 | i know, if he responses is best, but just how can i follow his key to fsmithreds key? | 14:51 |
clemens3 | sorry to ask noob gpg qustions | 14:51 |
clemens3 | but i am glad devuan puts the pgp info right at the top of the readme | 14:52 |
onefang | We have a page of PGP keys on our web site somewhere. | 14:53 |
onefang | https://www.devuan.org/os/team | 14:55 |
clemens3 | i installed his key | 14:56 |
clemens3 | but i see no one, who signed his key except himself.. maybe i am wrong | 14:56 |
onefang | Maybe you can work backwards, then forwards. I think rrq signed the Devuan key. | 14:58 |
clemens3 | but who signed rrq? | 14:59 |
clemens3 | the sha256sum file is signed by rrq | 15:00 |
onefang | Others know about our key signing stuff, I just think I remember things I have seen hanging out in the infrastructure areas. Hopefully one of them will pipe up soon. | 15:01 |
clemens3 | sure, i will hang on:) | 15:02 |
fsmithred | gpg --list-sigs 7729547634107541 | 15:04 |
onefang | All I know for sure is about my own key. I was asked to provide one for that web page, then I noticed my old one was waaay old, though it did have a decent web of trust behind it. So I generated a new one, but don't use it for anything. | 15:04 |
fsmithred | on my desktop machine shows that I signed ralph's key on 2022-09-25 | 15:04 |
fsmithred | onefang, sign your new key with your old one to connect the web of trust | 15:05 |
onefang | I may have. lol | 15:05 |
onefang | If any one actually needs me to sign stuff, then I'll put some actual effort into getting things done properly again. | 15:07 |
clemens3 | gpg --list-sigs rrq | 15:11 |
clemens3 | pub rsa2048 2017-07-20 [SC] | 15:11 |
clemens3 | E93D7167A4F5FA9E9FED497770285BA5CF280BA4 | 15:11 |
clemens3 | uid [ unknown] Ralph Ronnquist (rrq) <ralph.ronnquist@gmail.com> | 15:11 |
clemens3 | sig 3 70285BA5CF280BA4 2017-07-20 Ralph Ronnquist (rrq) <ralph.ronnquist@gmail.com> | 15:11 |
clemens3 | sub rsa2048 2017-07-20 [E] | 15:11 |
clemens3 | sig 70285BA5CF280BA4 2017-07-20 Ralph Ronnquist (rrq) <ralph.ronnquist@gmail.com> | 15:11 |
clemens3 | so he signed himself and nobody else? | 15:11 |
onefang | Careful. | 15:11 |
onefang | Tho bot might kick you if you do too much pasting like that. | 15:11 |
clemens3 | ok | 15:12 |
fsmithred | I don't get it. On my desktop, I see my sig, but on the laptop I only see ralph's self-sigs | 15:13 |
fsmithred | even after refreshing keys | 15:13 |
fsmithred | oh... | 15:13 |
fsmithred | maybe he didn't upload to a public server | 15:13 |
onefang | Anything to do with that expiring keys issue we had last year? | 15:14 |
clemens3 | ok, i used the web interface and found 2 more signatures! bingo. | 15:14 |
clemens3 | so what i did was using the devuan-dev.gpg file to import.. now i used the web, and that seems to have more | 15:15 |
clemens3 | ok, will go from here.. | 15:15 |
fsmithred | cool | 15:16 |
fsmithred | I have to leave in a few minutes | 15:16 |
fsmithred | onefang, I don't know. I have to read docs or notes just about every time I use gpg. | 15:17 |
onefang | That's why I only provided the minimum when I was asked to provide a key for that web page. | 15:18 |
onefang | If I need to I'll learn the ins and outs again. For just an unused key of mine, things are currently fine. | 15:18 |
anon | hi | 18:07 |
debdog | ahoy | 18:09 |
anon | I edited isolinux.cfg and grub.cfg and added "persistence" item, but it doesn't work. How to fix? https://pastebin.com/TNguK3uG | 18:35 |
gnarface | i suspect you were supposed to edit /etc/defaults/grub instead | 18:37 |
gnarface | * /etc/default/grub i mean | 18:37 |
gnarface | if you use paste.debian.net i'll actually look at what you pasted but i doubt i have any better guesses | 18:38 |
rwp | That paste is unavailable now. Times out. | 18:39 |
anon | gnarface, https://paste.debian.net/1271980/ | 18:44 |
gnarface | anon: you get some sort of error or does it just not show up in the menu when you reboot? | 18:45 |
anon | gnarface, after I select the "persistence" item, the system starts, but files from the Downloads folder are not saved to the "persistence" section | 18:48 |
gnarface | oh, that sounds like a different problem than i was expecting | 18:49 |
gnarface | i suspect you're missing something but i can't recall what it would be | 18:50 |
gnarface | stick around, someone knows though | 18:50 |
rwp | I have never used any persistence feature of live-boot images. I think that's the root of the question. | 18:55 |
gnarface | i did it once, i vaguely recall having a lot of trouble with it too but i think my mistake just boiled down to having the wrong location for the persistence partition or the wrong name or filesystem permissions of the top level directory or something like that | 18:57 |
anon | I will leave the computer for an hour | 19:04 |
anon | hi | 20:13 |
gnarface | what's your partition layout, anon? | 20:15 |
anon | gnarface, one ext4 partition | 20:18 |
gnarface | anon: doesn't persistence need its own partition? | 20:28 |
gnarface | i thought you had to make another partition just for persistence | 20:28 |
fsmithred | another partition or a loopback file | 20:33 |
fsmithred | and it needs a label of "persistence" | 20:33 |
fsmithred | or some other label and then list that label on command line | 20:34 |
fsmithred | and also a persistence.conf file in the root of the volume that describes what kind of persistence | 20:34 |
fsmithred | anon ^^^ | 20:34 |
anon | i set the "persistence" label and now everything works | 20:48 |
anon | i leaving the chat | 20:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!